Author Topic: remote viewing (Read 10811 times)

duh · « **Reply #25 on:** Oct 27, 2007, 03:51:39 PM »

i'm willing. Who is the first sender and when shall we do it?

Tonya · « **Reply #26 on:** Oct 27, 2007, 07:08:52 PM »

Sounds GREAT Bonnie! I would LOVE to be in....not sure I have read enough of the info Jim posted a link for yet, but I can read fast

Let me know when and I would LOVE to participate!!

Bonnie · « **Reply #27 on:** Oct 28, 2007, 10:01:36 PM »

Okay, so let's plan something when would be a convienent time for everybody? Maybe we should post a poll as to who wants to and when. Whatcha think?

Triss · « **Reply #28 on:** Oct 28, 2007, 10:13:26 PM »

Sounds good to me Bonnie, I think it is exciting... and are you going to be our sender?

Bonnie · « **Reply #29 on:** Oct 28, 2007, 10:14:46 PM »

I can Triss. It doesn't really matter. If someone else wants to that's fine with me.

Triss · « **Reply #30 on:** Oct 28, 2007, 10:17:14 PM »

We could all take turns and see whose thought are received by more people.

Bonnie · « **Reply #31 on:** Oct 31, 2007, 02:10:00 AM »

That sounds good to me Triss. So far it's you, me, Tonya and Duh. Did I miss anyone?

Has anyone given any thought to a time.

Actually most anytime would be okay with me, except around 5 or 6 in the evening. Usually have company then.

Tonya · « **Reply #32 on:** Oct 31, 2007, 08:09:08 AM »

I'm thinking around 12 or 1pm Eastern time. That way Triss is up and moving on the west coast.

Kiddos are in school on both coasts and we can relax and focus. Just a thought....

duh · « **Reply #33 on:** Oct 31, 2007, 10:50:15 AM »

That sounds really good. I also like the idea of us each taking a turn as sender.

Triss · « **Reply #34 on:** Nov 04, 2007, 12:03:18 PM »

Up and moving is a good thing... I like 9am my time, the kids have gone and usually Charlie is busy doing his own thing. It also gives me a full hour of time rather than needing to be rushed cuz I have to get ready to get Michael.

Bonnie · « **Reply #35 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 02:37:31 PM »

Ok, let's get the show on the road.

Who wants to be the first sender? It doesn't matter to me. I have never done this either.

Let's pick a day and time.

Let's do it.

Tonya · « **Reply #36 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 02:48:02 PM »

How about Wednesday at 1pm EST. Is that OK with everyone? I think either Bonnie or Duh should send, simply because they have experience with reading things and may also have a stronger "sending vibe" so to speak.

Just my opinion- who else wants to input??

Triss · « **Reply #37 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 03:29:59 PM »

Ok that works for me... I agree about Bonnie or Duh being a sender.

duh · « **Reply #38 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 04:19:29 PM »

I'll be happy to send Wednesday at 1p.m. I look forward to it. But I'm not a strong sender so I hope it is very quiet at your place at the appointed hour. Good Luck all.

Tonya · « **Reply #39 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 05:26:52 PM »

I am soooo excited about this!!

Can't wait!!

Dianna · « **Reply #40 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 07:12:06 PM »

I want in, too, so make sure that I get it sent to me, too!

But, I don't understand the "sending" part of it. Seems like I read that someone is just supposed to put something in an envelope and the others are supposed to discern what it is through meditating. I hope we get this figured out before we start this...

Are we all thinking about the same thing? Are we doing this experiment like is outlined in the lessons of the pdf manual? Have we all read the manual? I plan on reading all of this manual through one more time before Wednesday...

The sending that it looks like y'all are talking about looks more in the lines of straight telepathy.

Jim · « **Reply #41 on:** Nov 05, 2007, 07:47:59 PM »

Quote from: Dianna on Nov 05, 2007, 07:12:06 PM

The sending that it looks like y'all are talking about looks more in the lines of straight telepathy.

I scanned the manual, looked again at the YouTube videos and the "sending" part has me confused too. Take a look at this Remote Viewing Test. It has some really good info.

I guess you can do it like you want but I'm not sure it would meet the definition of "remote viewing". Remote viewing is the psychic technique of "seeing" and describing distant locations. The technique has been used in recent years by intelligence agencies as a method of spying, or "ESP-ionage".

Tonya · « **Reply #42 on:** Nov 06, 2007, 07:36:15 AM »

Great link Jim....I tried it with the kiddos here and the TV on....not a good idea. I got squat. I'll try again once Mackenna goes down for a nap(another reason I suggested 1pm

) Some really cool info, tho!

duh · « **Reply #43 on:** Nov 06, 2007, 09:36:10 AM »

I averaged 20% on the three I tried. But I'm not sure I'm in the right mood to work it right now. So that doesn't seem to bad to me.

Let's see should we try 10 different locations in our test and I'll just choose the first ten and give them codes?

ok here are the codes for my ten locations Good luck all!

axll
kbja
ndob
zfcg
hemp
iqrw
stac
mwrc
hlbd
wkyo

I guess when you've identified the shapes textures and all you could pm me and I'll let you know what the picture was and if it had those shapes, testures and all in them.

Am I doing this right?

Bonnie · « **Reply #44 on:** Nov 06, 2007, 05:34:16 PM »

Quote

Is anyone interested in trying an experiment just for fun.

Actually I had something a little different in mind. Just for fun, but whatever Jim and Duh decide will be fine with me.

Just let me know.

Triss · « **Reply #45 on:** Nov 06, 2007, 06:08:43 PM »

I am in with whatever, but I think we all need to be on the same page so we all are in the right mindset.

Bonnie, what did you have in mind?

And I am way confused about what you posted duh... I have to read that remote viewing thing again.

Bonnie · « **Reply #46 on:** Nov 06, 2007, 08:55:16 PM »

Quote

I guess you can do it like you want but I'm not sure it would meet the definition of "remote viewing". Remote viewing is the psychic technique of "seeing" and describing distant locations. The technique has been used in recent years by intelligence agencies as a method of spying, or "ESP-ionage".

You are absolutely right Jim, but I didn't think that we were ready for that. At least I'm not. This is what I had in mind.

I thought that one of us could meditate on a picture or something and the rest of us could try to tune into it. I thought it would be a good exercise and fun.

I am willing to try whatever ya'll want to try. I won't be ready to try it tomorrow though. The course has several days of homework and a book called the Einstein Factor that is a must read for the course. So I'll let ya'll try it first.

I'll will be anxiously awaiting to hear the results.]

Dianna · « **Reply #47 on:** Nov 06, 2007, 10:32:38 PM »

Aunt Bonnie, like you, I would rather do a simple experiment first until all of us have had the chance to study the course outlined in the manual. I don't think it is just a simple thing to just read about it and then be accurate without any practice.

I have tried a few simple exercises today on another link that I found. It was interesting the way the instuctor prepared you to get ready to experiment. I will post that link tomorrow, if I can find it again.

I would be willing to try your experiment any time...

duh · « **Reply #48 on:** Nov 07, 2007, 08:06:46 AM »

So we are still on for the mind reading experiment today at 1 pm eastern standard time?

Triss · « **Reply #49 on:** Nov 07, 2007, 01:09:13 PM »

I am afraid that today is just crazy for me and I am not anywhere close to a mental place to be ready to receive anything... I would also like to know more about what we are trying to do so want to be kept in mind for the next experiment.

News:

Author Topic: remote viewing (Read 10811 times)